Traceroute vs. Ping: When to Use Each

Let’s talk about the most fundamental network diagnostic tools: ping and traceroute. These command-line utilities have been the backbone of network troubleshooting for decades, yet many IT professionals struggle to use them in the right context. Knowing which tool to use (and when) can mean the difference between a five-minute fix and hours of frustration.

While both ping and traceroute help diagnose network connectivity issues, they serve distinctly different purposes. Ping answers the question "Can I reach this destination?" while traceroute answers "What path am I taking to get there, and where is it breaking? " Understanding this fundamental difference transforms how network problems get solved.

This guide breaks down everything network admins need to know about ping vs traceroute: how each tool works under the hood, when to deploy them, and how to interpret their results for faster troubleshooting.

The ping command is the simplest network diagnostic tool in any admin's toolkit. At its core, ping checks whether a remote host is reachable and measures how long it takes for data to make a round trip. The name actually comes from submarine sonar technology, send out a signal and listen for the echo.

Ping operates using the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), specifically ICMP Echo Request and Echo Reply messages. Here's the technical breakdown in plain terms:

1. Echo Request: When a ping command runs, the source computer sends an ICMP Echo Request packet to the target IP address

2. Echo Reply: If the destination is reachable and configured to respond, it sends back an ICMP Echo Reply packet

3. Measurement: The ping utility measures the time between sending the request and receiving the reply, this is the round-trip time (RTT)

The process repeats for each packet sent (typically 4 packets on Windows, continuous on Linux/Mac until stopped). Each response provides three critical metrics:

• Latency: The round-trip time measured in milliseconds (ms)
• Packet Loss: The percentage of packets that never returned
• Jitter: Variation in latency between packets (though not always explicitly shown)

A successful ping command output looks something like this:

This tells the story of healthy connectivity: the host responds consistently, latency is low and stable (14-16ms), and zero packets were lost. But ping can also reveal problems:

• Request timeout: The destination isn't responding (could be down, firewalled, or unreachable)
• High latency: Round-trip times above 100ms suggest congestion or distance issues
• Packet loss: Missing replies indicate network instability or overloaded links
• Variable latency: Wide swings between packets (e.g., 15ms, then 150ms, then 20ms) point to congestion

How to Perform Ping Tests: Different Tools and Techniques

Learn how ping tests work, their limits, and how to perform them. Learn how to use ping to measure Internet speed, latency, and packet loss using different techniques.

Learn more

The ping command excels at several specific troubleshooting scenarios:

• Quick Connectivity Verification: Before diving into complex diagnostics, ping test confirms basic reachability. Can the workstation reach the default gateway? Can it reach the DNS server? A simple ping answers these fundamental questions in seconds.
• Baseline Performance Measurement: Running ping test over several minutes establishes normal latency patterns. A baseline of 20-25ms to a critical server means that 80ms later signals a problem worth investigating.
• Monitoring Network Stability: Continuous ping tests reveal intermittent issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. Packet loss that occurs every few minutes might not affect a single test but becomes obvious over a 30-minute ping session.
• Testing After Changes: After modifying routing, firewall rules, or network equipment, ping test provides immediate feedback on whether the changes broke connectivity. It's the "did that work?" test every admin runs.

The beauty of ping test lies in its simplicity. It's fast, lightweight, and available on every operating system without additional software. But ping tests have significant limitations, they only tell you about the endpoint, not the journey to get there. That's where traceroute comes in.

While ping tests the destination, traceroute maps the entire path packets take to reach it. Think of ping as checking whether a street address exists, while traceroute provides turn-by-turn directions showing exactly which roads were taken to get there.

Screenshot from Obkio's Visual Traceroute Tool

Traceroute exploits a clever feature of IP packets called Time to Live (TTL). Every IP packet includes a TTL value that decrements by one each time it passes through a router. When TTL reaches zero, the router discards the packet and sends an ICMP "Time Exceeded" message back to the source.

This built-in mechanism prevents packets from circulating endlessly in routing loops, but traceroute uses it for network mapping:

1. First probe: Traceroute sends a packet with TTL=1. The first router decrements it to 0, drops the packet, and replies with "Time Exceeded", revealing the first hop

2. Second probe: A packet with TTL=2 makes it past the first router, but the second router drops it and responds, revealing the second hop

3. Incremental discovery: This process repeats with increasing TTL values until packets reach the final destination

The result is a complete map of every router (hop) between source and destination, along with the latency to reach each one.

A typical traceroute output reveals the network path:

1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.1

2 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10.50.1.1

3 15 ms 16 ms 15 ms 72.14.212.10

4 25 ms 26 ms 25 ms 108.170.252.1

5 30 ms 31 ms 30 ms 142.250.238.46

Each line represents one hop in the journey. The three time values show latency for three separate probe packets to that hop, revealing consistency. In this example, latency increases gradually, normal behaviour as packets traverse more routers and longer distances.

But traceroute also exposes problems:

• Asterisks (*): No response from that hop (often due to firewall rules blocking ICMP, not necessarily a problem)
• Sudden latency spikes: If hop 5 shows 30ms but hop 6 jumps to 200ms, the issue likely lies at or just after hop 6
• Timeouts mid-path: If traceroute stops responding after hop 8 of 15, that's where packets are being dropped

What are Traceroutes and How Do Traceroutes Work?

Learn about what a traceroute is, how traceroutes work, how to read a traceroute, and how they help network engineers troubleshoot network issues.

Learn more

The traceroute command shines when ping alone can't pinpoint the problem:

• Identifying Where Packet Loss Occurs: Ping shows 30% packet loss to a destination, but where? Traceroute reveals if packets are dropping at hop 3 (the ISP's edge router) or hop 12 (near the destination), completely changing the troubleshooting approach.
• Finding Routing Issues or Loops: Sometimes packets take bizarre paths, routing to New York when they should go to Chicago, or worse, bouncing between the same two routers repeatedly. Traceroute exposes these routing misconfigurations that ping never reveals.
• Understanding Network Topology: New to an organization's network? Traceroute to various destinations maps out the infrastructure: which ISP handles traffic, whether there's a redundant path, and how many hops sit between locations.
• Diagnosing Latency at Specific Hops: When users complain about slowness, traceroute identifies the culprit. Latency might be fine for 10 hops, then suddenly spike at hop 11, that's the congested or misconfigured link causing problems.
• Investigating Routing Changes: After ISP maintenance or infrastructure changes, traceroute confirms whether traffic is following the expected new path or still routing through old equipment.

The traceroute command provides the investigative depth that ping lacks. However, it's slower to execute and more complex to interpret. Choosing between ping and traceroute, or knowing when to use both, separates effective troubleshooters from those fumbling in the dark.

Understanding when to use ping vs traceroute requires knowing how these tools differ fundamentally. They're not competing solutions, they're complementary tools designed fordifferent diagnostic scenarios.

Ping excels at answering:

• Is the host up and responding?
• What's the current latency?
• Is there packet loss?
• Is connectivity stable over time?

Ping cannot reveal:

• Where in the path do problems occur
• Which router or link is causing latency
• What route are packets taking
• Why connectivity fails (firewall vs. routing vs. host down)

Traceroute excels at answering:

• What path do packets take?
• Where does latency increase significantly?
• At which hop are packets being dropped?
• How many routers exist between source and destination?
• Are packets being routed efficiently?

Traceroute cannot reveal:

• Real-time ongoing connectivity status (it's a point-in-time test)
• Application-level problems (only tests network layer)
• Asymmetric return paths (shows only the forward path in most cases)
• Issues with ICMP rate-limiting that might not affect actual traffic

The ping command completes almost instantly because it only tests one endpoint. Four packets to a destination and back takes mere seconds, making it perfect for rapid-fire testing during troubleshooting sessions.

Traceroute, by contrast, must methodically probe each hop. For a destination 15 hops away, with three probes per hop, that's 45+ packets to send and wait for responses. If any hop is slow to respond or times out, the total time increases further. This makes traceroute impractical for continuous monitoring but invaluable for deep investigation.

The ping command should be the first tool reached for in these scenarios:

1. Quick Connectivity Checks

When a user reports "I can't connect," ping provides the fastest yes/no answer. Ping the user's workstation, then the server they're trying to reach, then the default gateway. Within 10 seconds, the basic connectivity landscape becomes clear.

2. Continuous Monitoring Scenarios

Running ping with large or infinite packet counts reveals patterns over time. A script that pings a critical server every second for an hour can capture intermittent issues that occur outside business hours or happen too briefly for users to report consistently.

3. Baseline Performance Measurement

Before declaring a problem, establish what "normal" looks like. Ping a server regularly during known-good periods to document typical latency ranges. That 50ms baseline means 120ms later represents real degradation, not just network behavior during peak hours.

4. Simple Up/Down Status Verification

For basic availability monitoring (Is the firewall responding? Is the backup server online?), ping test provides a lightweight health check without the overhead of traceroute or more complex protocols.

5. After Configuration Changes

Every time firewall rules change, VLANs are reconfigured, or routing protocols are adjusted, ping immediately confirms whether the change broke anything. It's the fastest sanity check before moving on to the next task.

The bottom line: Use ping when the question is "Is there a problem?" rather than "Where is the problem?"

The traceroute command becomes essential when ping reveals a problem but doesn't explain it. You can better troubleshoot network issues using Traceroute and faciliate:

1. Identifying the Location of Network Problems

Ping shows 200ms latency and 15% packet loss to a remote office. Traceroute reveals whether the issue is at hop 2 (the local ISP), hop 8 (the internet backbone), or hop 14 (the remote site's network), completely changing who gets called for support.

2. Understanding Complex Routing Paths

Mergers, acquisitions, and multi-ISP environments create routing complexity. Traceroute maps how traffic flows between sites, revealing whether packets route through the expected MPLS connection or unexpectedly traverse the public internet.

3. Troubleshooting Specific Hop Failures

When packet loss occurs, traceroute pinpoints the exact router or link responsible. Maybe packets successfully reach hop 10, then 40% start failing at hop 11, that's the congested or failing link that needs attention.

4. Investigating Routing Changes

After ISP maintenance windows or routing protocol convergence, traceroute confirms traffic is following the intended new path. Unexpected routing changes often explain sudden performance shifts that ping alone can't diagnose.

5. Diagnosing Asymmetric Routing Issues

While standard traceroute only shows the forward path, running it from both ends of a connection can reveal asymmetric routing, where traffic takes one path outbound and a completely different path returning. This matters when troubleshooting firewall issues or traffic shaping policies.

6. Understanding Network Topology for New Infrastructure

Planning to deploy new servers or services? Traceroute from various locations maps the existing network structure, revealing how many hops currently separate sites and whether traffic flows through expected infrastructure.

The bottom line: Use traceroute when the question shifts from "Is there a problem?" to "Where exactly is the problem, and what's causing it?"

The most effective network diagnostics don't choose between ping and traceroute—they use both tools strategically in sequence.

Before diving into detailed analysis, ping validates that an issue actually exists:

• Ping the destination to confirm it's unreachable or experiencing high latency
• Ping intermediate known-good hosts (like the default gateway) to rule out local problems
• Run extended ping tests (50-100 packets) to confirm the issue is consistent, not transient

If ping shows everything is fine, the problem might be application-level rather than network connectivity.

Once ping confirms a problem, traceroute maps where in the path it occurs:

• Run traceroute to the destination and note where latency spikes or packets start dropping
• Look for patterns, does the issue appear at the ISP boundary? At a specific carrier? Near the destination?
• Check whether the routing path makes sense or if traffic is taking an unexpected route

Screenshot from Obkio's Network Monitoring Tool

After traceroute identifies the problematic hop, use ping to test specific points:

• Ping the router immediately before the problem hop (often succeeds)
• Ping the problematic router itself (if accessible)
• Ping the router immediately after (often fails or shows high latency)

This focused ping testing confirms exactly which link or device is causing issues.

What Using Only Ping Misses: Ping shows high latency but doesn't indicate whether the problem is one hop away or fifteen hops away. Teams waste time checking the wrong equipment because they lack path visibility.

What Using Only Traceroute Misses: Traceroute provides a point-in-time snapshot but doesn't reveal whether the problem is persistent or intermittent. Running it once might show normal routing, while the actual issue occurs sporadically.

The Power of Combined Diagnostics: Starting with ping to validate issues, escalating to traceroute to localize them, then returning to targeted ping for confirmation creates a logical workflow that solves problems faster and with more confidence.

Ping and traceroute are powerful, but they share a fundamental limitation: they're manual, point-in-time tests. Running these commands provides a snapshot of network behaviour at that exact moment, but networks are dynamic environments where problems come and go, often when no one is watching.

• Time-Consuming Repetition: How many times does a network admin run the same ping or traceroute commands throughout the day? Testing five critical servers every hour means running 40 commands per day, every day. This approach doesn't scale.
• No Historical Context: Did latency to that server spike last night at 2 AM? Manual testing can't answer that question unless someone was running commands at 2 AM. Problems that occur outside business hours often go undetected until users complain.
• Reactive, Not Proactive: Manual tools require someone to initiate the test. By the time an admin runs traceroute, users have already experienced problems, tickets have been opened, and damage to productivity has occurred. There's no warning before issues escalate.
• Lack of Visualization: Staring at command-line output is fine for a single test, but comparing traceroute results from different time periods or visualizing trends across multiple paths requires manual effort and spreadsheet work.
• Intermittent Issues Go Unnoticed: A network link that drops 10% of packets for two minutes every hour might work fine during manual testing but creates terrible user experience. Catching these intermittent problems with ping or traceroute requires luck or continuous monitoring.

Modern network environments (with cloud services, remote offices, SD-WAN, and distributed applications) need continuous network visibility that command-line tools simply can't provide alone.

This is where solutions like Obkio transform network troubleshooting from reactive manual testing to proactive continuous monitoring. Obkio is a network performance monitoring and troubleshooting solution that provides real-time visibility into network health, automated diagnostics, and proactive alerting for IT teams managing complex, distributed networks.

Instead of running ping and traceroute when problems occur, automated monitoring runs these diagnostics continuously, building historical baselines and alerting teams to issues before users report them.

Obkio automates the core functions of both ping and traceroute, providing the same diagnostic power with several critical advantages:

• 24/7 Continuous Testing: Monitoring agents continuously test network paths without manual intervention
• Historical Trending: Every test result is stored, allowing teams to compare current performance against baselines or investigate issues that occurred in the past
• Proactive Alerting: Notifications trigger when latency exceeds thresholds or packet loss appears, often before end users notice problems
• Visual Dashboards: Complex network behaviour becomes immediately understandable through graphs and visual representations

Two features in particular bring the power of ping and traceroute into the modern monitoring era: new Visual Traceroute tool and Network Destinations.

Traditional command-line traceroute provides valuable information, but interpreting text-based output, especially when comparing multiple traceroute runs or tracking changes over time, quickly becomes tedious. Obkio's Visual Traceroute Tool transforms this diagnostic process into an intuitive visual experience.

• 14-day free trial of all premium features
• Deploy in just 10 minutes
• Monitor performance in all key network locations
• Measure real-time network metrics
• Identify and troubleshoot live network problems

Visual Traceroute operates on the same fundamental principle as the traceroute command, mapping the hop-by-hop path packets take through the network, but presents the results in a way that makes patterns and problems immediately obvious:

• Interactive Path Visualization: Instead of reading through lines of text, network paths appear as visual maps with each hop clearly represented. Hover over any hop to see detailed statistics.
• Real-Time Hop-by-Hop Analysis: As Visual Traceroute runs, it displays latency for each hop in real-time with colour coding. Green hops indicate normal latency, yellow suggests elevated latency, and red flags significant problems, instant visual feedback that text output can't match.
• Historical Comparison: Unlike command-line traceroute which only shows current results, Visual Traceroute retains historical data (One-minute data granularity and six months of history). Compare today's routing path against yesterday's or last week's to spot routing changes that might explain sudden performance shifts.
• Problem Hop Identification: When packet loss or latency spikes occur, Visual Traceroute highlights the specific hop where issues begin. Instead of manually comparing latency numbers across hops, the visual representation makes problems jump out immediately.

• Faster Problem Identification: Color-coded visual paths make issues immediately apparent without reading through text output line by line.
• Better for Non-Expert Users: Junior admins or help desk staff can identify network path problems without deep expertise in reading traceroute output.
• Trend Analysis: Seeing how routing paths change over time reveals patterns—maybe traffic shifts to a slower path during peak hours, or routing becomes unstable after specific events.
• Reduced Context Switching: Instead of running traceroute at a command line, then copying output to documentation, then explaining findings to colleagues, Visual Traceroute provides shareable visual results that communicate issues clearly.
• Continuous Path Monitoring: Visual Traceroute can run automatically at scheduled intervals, catching routing changes or intermittent path issues without manual testing.

For network teams troubleshooting performance issues, Visual Traceroute delivers the diagnostic power of traditional traceroute with the speed and clarity modern networks demand.

Obkio’s Visual Traceroute Tool: Feature Release

Obkio’s Network Performance Monitoring solution announces the release of our all-new Visual Traceroute Tool integrated into Obkio’s application. Read more!

Learn more

If Visual Traceroute is the modern evolution of the traceroute command, then Obkio's Network Destinations feature is the continuous monitoring equivalent of ping, but far more powerful.

The Network Destinations feature performs continuous ICMP monitoring (essentially automated ping) to critical endpoints throughout the network and beyond. Instead of manually running ping commands to check if servers, websites, or cloud services are reachable, Network Destinations automatically monitors these targets 24/7.

• Continuous Ping-Like Monitoring: Monitoring agents send ICMP probes to configured destinations at regular intervals (typically every few seconds), just like running ping in an infinite loop, but without requiring manual command execution.
• Critical Endpoint Tracking: Network Destinations can monitor any reachable endpoint: internal servers, cloud services (AWS, Azure, GCP), SaaS applications, remote office gateways, ISP gateways, or any IP address that matters to business operations.
• Performance Metrics Collection: Beyond simple up/down status, Network Destinations captures the same metrics ping provides (latency, packet loss, and jitter) and stores them historically for trend analysis.
• Proactive Alerting: When a destination becomes unreachable or performance degrades beyond configured thresholds, alerts trigger immediately via email, Slack, webhooks, or other integrations. Teams learn about problems proactively instead of waiting for user complaints.

Network Destinations makes it simple to monitor what matters most:

Internal Servers: Monitor domain controllers, file servers, database servers, and application servers to ensure internal infrastructure remains reachable and responsive.

Cloud Services: Track connectivity and latency to AWS regions, Azure data centers, or Google Cloud infrastructure that hosts critical applications or data.

SaaS Applications: Monitor reachability to Microsoft 365, Salesforce, ServiceNow, or any cloud application that employees depend on daily.

Remote Office Connectivity: Ensure VPN endpoints, SD-WAN appliances, or site-to-site connections remain operational by monitoring gateway devices at each location.

ISP Performance: Track latency and packet loss to ISP gateways to identify when performance issues stem from the service provider rather than internal infrastructure.

Catching Intermittent Issues: That server that becomes unreachable for five minutes every night at midnight? Manual ping testing will never catch it, but Network Destinations monitoring will, complete with timestamps and performance data for troubleshooting.

Historical Performance Baselines: After days or weeks of monitoring, clear baselines emerge. Typical latency to a cloud service might be 45-50ms, so when it suddenly hits 150ms, the system alerts that something changed, even if the destination is technically still reachable.

Proactive Problem Detection: Many network issues start small, latency creeps up gradually, or occasional packet loss becomes more frequent. Network Destinations identifies these trends before they become user-impacting outages.

Reduced Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR): When alerts trigger, teams already know which destination is affected, what the symptoms are (high latency vs. packet loss vs. complete failure), and have historical context about when the problem began.

No Manual Intervention Required: Unlike running ping commands throughout the day, Network Destinations operates automatically. Configure monitoring once, then focus on other tasks while the system watches critical endpoints continuously.

The comparison between manual ping/traceroute commands and automated monitoring solutions like Obkio comes down to several key advantages:

Manual testing provides snapshots, what the network looks like at this exact moment. Automated monitoring provides a continuous film, what the network looks like over hours, days, and weeks. Intermittent issues, gradual performance degradation, and time-specific problems become visible with continuous data that manual testing can't capture.

Command-line tools don't remember previous results. Did latency to that server increase this week compared to last month? Manual testing requires keeping logs and comparing them manually. Automated monitoring stores everything, making trend analysis simple and enabling data-driven decisions about network capacity and performance.

Manual tools require someone to recognize a problem exists, then initiate testing. Automated monitoring detects anomalies immediately and alerts the team, often before users notice issues. This proactive approach dramatically reduces mean time to detection (MTTD) and mean time to resolution (MTTR).

Modern networks span multiple offices, cloud providers, remote workers, and SaaS applications. Manually testing connectivity to dozens or hundreds of critical endpoints is impractical. Automated monitoring handles this complexity effortlessly, providing unified visibility across the entire distributed network.

Network admins have limited time and countless responsibilities. Spending hours each week running manual ping and traceroute commands is inefficient. Automated monitoring handles routine testing, freeing skilled staff to focus on strategic projects and complex troubleshooting that actually requires human expertise.

Traceroute Troubleshooting: How To Identify Network Issues with Traceroutes?

Learn how to troubleshoot with Traceroutes by analyzing Traceroute metrics, exploring common issues and advanced techniques for Traceroute troubleshooting.

Learn more

Even with automated monitoring in place, network admins will still reach for ping and traceroute regularly. Using these tools effectively requires understanding their nuances and potential pitfalls.

1. Choose Appropriate Packet Sizes: The default ping uses small packets (32-56 bytes), but larger packets can reveal MTU issues or behave differently on congested links. Test with various packet sizes (100, 500, 1400 bytes) when troubleshooting unusual behaviour.

2. Run Sufficient Packet Counts: Four ping packets (the Windows default) might miss intermittent issues. For serious troubleshooting, send at least 50-100 packets to identify patterns in packet loss and latency variation.

3. Understand Normal vs. Abnormal Latency: Context matters. 100ms latency to a server in the same building is terrible; 100ms to a server across the ocean is excellent. Know typical latency ranges for different destinations to recognize real problems.

4. Avoid False Positives from ICMP Rate Limiting: Many routers and firewalls intentionally rate-limit or deprioritize ICMP packets to prevent abuse. Occasional ping timeouts might not indicate real connectivity problems, verify with application-level testing.

5. Establish Baselines During Normal Operations: Don't wait until problems occur to learn what "good" looks like. Ping critical systems during known-good periods to document normal latency ranges and packet loss (if any).

1. Understand Timeouts and Asterisks: Asterisks in traceroute output don't always mean problems. Many routers are configured not to respond to traceroute probes while still forwarding traffic normally. If later hops respond, traffic is likely getting through fine.

2. Account for Firewalls and ICMP Filtering: Security devices often block or rate-limit ICMP, which can make traceroute results incomplete or misleading. This doesn't necessarily indicate network problems, just security policies.

3. Know Your Traceroute Variants: Different implementations use different probe types. Unix/Linux traceroute typically uses UDP packets, while Windows tracert uses ICMP. Some networks handle these differently. Try TCP-based traceroute (using tcptraceroute) when others fail.

4. Run Multiple Traceroute Tests: A single traceroute run might catch a moment of network instability or load-balanced path selection. Run traceroute 3-5 times and compare results to distinguish normal variation from persistent problems.

5. Look for Asymmetric Routing: Traceroute shows the forward path, but return traffic might take a completely different route. When troubleshooting issues involving firewalls or traffic shaping, run traceroute from both ends to see if paths differ significantly.

1. Consider ICMP Deprioritization: Network equipment often handles ICMP packets (used by ping and traceroute) differently than regular data traffic. Results might not perfectly reflect how application traffic behaves, especially during congestion.

2. Document Baseline Results: Keep records of what normal ping and traceroute results look like for critical paths. This documentation becomes invaluable when troubleshooting, is this latency unusual, or just typical for this path during business hours?

3. Know When to Escalate to Advanced Tools: Ping and traceroute answer many questions, but not all. For deeper packet-level analysis, turn to tools like MTR (combines ping and traceroute), pathping (Windows variant with statistics), Wireshark (packet captures), or comprehensive monitoring platforms.

4. Combine with Other Diagnostics: Network issues often have multiple symptoms. Combine ping/traceroute with DNS testing (nslookup, dig), connectivity testing (telnet to specific ports), and application-specific diagnostics for complete troubleshooting.

5. Respect Security Policies: In production environments, excessive ping or traceroute testing can trigger security alerts or affect network performance. Coordinate with security teams and avoid flooding networks with test traffic.

Even experienced network admins fall into these common traps when using ping and traceroute:

1. Misinterpreting Single Ping Test Results

The Pitfall: Running ping test once and concluding "the network is fine" or "the network is broken" based on one test. Networks are dynamic, performance varies based on load, routing changes, and intermittent issues.

How to Avoid It: Always run multiple tests across different time periods before drawing conclusions. What looks like a problem at 9 AM might be normal behaviour during peak usage, or what seems fine at 3 PM might be hiding an issue that only occurs overnight.

2. Ignoring ICMP Deprioritization

The Pitfall: Treating ping/traceroute results as definitive when many routers deliberately deprioritize ICMP packets. This can make ICMP-based tests show high latency or packet loss while actual data traffic flows normally.

How to Avoid It: Correlate ping/traceroute results with actual application behavior. If ping shows problems but applications work fine, ICMP deprioritization might be the explanation. Consider application-level monitoring to confirm real user impact.

3. Not Considering Asymmetric Routing

The Pitfall: Assuming network paths are symmetric, that traffic takes the same route in both directions. Asymmetric routing is common, especially with load balancing, multiple ISPs, or complex routing policies. Traceroute only shows the forward path.

How to Avoid It: Run traceroute from both ends of a connection when troubleshooting. If users in Office A can't reach servers in Office B properly, run traceroute from A to B and from B to A to see if different paths are involved.

4. Over-Relying on Command-Line Tools for Ongoing Monitoring

The Pitfall: Using ping and traceroute as the primary network monitoring strategy, running them manually throughout the day to check status. This approach doesn't scale, misses issues that occur when no one is testing, and provides no historical context.

How to Avoid It: Use ping and traceroute for on-demand troubleshooting and investigation, but implement automated monitoring for ongoing visibility. Manual tools and automated monitoring serve different purposes, both have value in the right context.

5. Failing to Establish Baselines

The Pitfall: Not knowing what "normal" looks like makes it impossible to recognize problems. Is 50ms latency good or bad? Is 2% packet loss acceptable? Without baselines, every diagnostic test requires guesswork.

How to Avoid It: Document typical performance during known-good periods. Record what ping latency normally looks like to critical destinations during different times of day. Establish what packet loss (if any) is typical for each path. These baselines turn diagnostics from guesswork into data-driven analysis.

6. Ignoring the Limitations of Each Tool

The Pitfall: Expecting ping to diagnose routing problems or expecting traceroute to reveal intermittent packet loss. Each tool has specific strengths and blind spots.

How to Avoid It: Understand what questions each tool can and cannot answer. Use the right tool for the diagnostic need, and know when problems require combining tools or escalating to more advanced diagnostics.

The difference between novice and experienced troubleshooters often comes down to knowing which tool to use when and understanding what the results actually mean.

But modern networks have outgrown purely manual diagnostics. Cloud services, remote offices, SD-WAN, distributed applications, and hybrid infrastructure create complexity that manual ping and traceroute testing can't cover comprehensively. Intermittent issues, gradual performance degradation, and problems occurring outside business hours demand continuous visibility that command-line tools alone cannot provide.

This is where automated network performance monitoring transforms operations. Solutions like Obkio bring the diagnostic power of ping and traceroute into continuous, automated monitoring:

• Visual Traceroute provides the path mapping capabilities of traceroute with visual clarity and historical comparison
• Network Destinations delivers continuous ICMP monitoring for critical endpoints, catching issues proactively before users report them

Manual tools still have their place for on-demand investigation and deep-dive troubleshooting. But automated monitoring provides the 24/7 visibility, historical trending, and proactive alerting that modern network teams need to stay ahead of problems instead of constantly reacting to them.

Ready to move beyond manual ping and traceroute commands? Try Obkio's Visual Traceroute and Network Destinations features with a free trial and experience comprehensive network monitoring that catches problems before they impact users.

• 14-day free trial of all premium features
• Deploy in just 10 minutes
• Monitor performance in all key network locations
• Measure real-time network metrics
• Identify and troubleshoot live network problems